Came across this article online. I am going to try if it is really a good one. This tip is quite useful for us to identify a good company provided it is really accurate :P. Anyway it looks like the index is subjective to every country.
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
How do we measure a company's financial status?
Came across this article online. I am going to try if it is really a good one. This tip is quite useful for us to identify a good company provided it is really accurate :P. Anyway it looks like the index is subjective to every country.
Friday, March 20, 2009
Run java program at backend on Windows
Normally, if you want to start a Java program to run as back end process, just type the command follow by a '&'. However, how do you do the same on Windows?
Yesterday my colleague was facing this problem and i remembered i have gone through the same problem before in my previous company. After we went through the windows command list i found something, which is the 'start' command. Then i remembered i might have used this command before when i had faced the same problem last time.
So we tried the 'start' command and it was successful.
Yesterday my colleague was facing this problem and i remembered i have gone through the same problem before in my previous company. After we went through the windows command list i found something, which is the 'start' command. Then i remembered i might have used this command before when i had faced the same problem last time.
So we tried the 'start' command and it was successful.
Thursday, March 19, 2009
Why IT Project Fails!
I have come across an article talking about why IT project fails!
Take a look on it!
My experience told me that business users often do not want to spend much time with the developers during the development of a system. They do not realize that it is very very critical and useful to the final result of the system by spending time reviewing developers work to find out whether something is missing at the early phase of the project! Well i do agree that agile methodology approach is very very good provided the business users are willing to allocate resource to examine the system.
Take a look on it!
My experience told me that business users often do not want to spend much time with the developers during the development of a system. They do not realize that it is very very critical and useful to the final result of the system by spending time reviewing developers work to find out whether something is missing at the early phase of the project! Well i do agree that agile methodology approach is very very good provided the business users are willing to allocate resource to examine the system.
Monday, March 16, 2009
Finally i am working on 2nd project!!!
Finally i have a chance to work on 2nd project after joining this company.
The first one has gone for production and it is being supported by the production support team now. Anyway there are several environment issues occurring recently. I want to help them but too bad i am involved in new project already.
To be accurate it is not my 2nd project, but 3rd one. I was involved in a 3 days proof of concept anyway and that gave me a terrible nightmares. It was a typical last minute project which everyone in the team had to work extra time! It is about to build a portal for a telecommunications client.
Now one weird thing of the WBIA running on production is that sometimes the message will be processed twice! This creates a false impression to users of the telco company that the account registration process just fails! The production support team should be quite tension right now of this issue. I think it has something to do with the configuration anyway that why certain XML message is processed twice. Why it is routed back to the adapter again!
Also today i have learned how to upload a WSDL file to DataPower and do a testing today! My teammate said basically we can replace the whole DataPower team after we learned how to configure the WSDL at DataPower. That's funny!
The first one has gone for production and it is being supported by the production support team now. Anyway there are several environment issues occurring recently. I want to help them but too bad i am involved in new project already.
To be accurate it is not my 2nd project, but 3rd one. I was involved in a 3 days proof of concept anyway and that gave me a terrible nightmares. It was a typical last minute project which everyone in the team had to work extra time! It is about to build a portal for a telecommunications client.
Now one weird thing of the WBIA running on production is that sometimes the message will be processed twice! This creates a false impression to users of the telco company that the account registration process just fails! The production support team should be quite tension right now of this issue. I think it has something to do with the configuration anyway that why certain XML message is processed twice. Why it is routed back to the adapter again!
Also today i have learned how to upload a WSDL file to DataPower and do a testing today! My teammate said basically we can replace the whole DataPower team after we learned how to configure the WSDL at DataPower. That's funny!
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Working on wrong direction
One day the client raised an issue to me. That issue would not happen if the Websphere Message Broker (WMB) flow that i deployed on the server is running fine.
I checked the queue and channel status by using a tool called MQJ explorer and found out both the sender and receiver channels' status were 'inactive'. I then turned it to 'running' again. However their status will still be 'inactive' after some time. I had gone mad about this and spent a whole day trying to find out what went wrong.
In the end i know i went into the wrong direction. It is normal that after some time the status of the channels go to 'inactive'. As long as the transmission trigger is on then there will be no problem. When the next message comes in then the sender and receiver channels will be activated again.
So what actually went wrong. Argh it is because the portal team did not set the correct queue name to the JMS header of the XML message and thus no response from the whole flow!
I checked the queue and channel status by using a tool called MQJ explorer and found out both the sender and receiver channels' status were 'inactive'. I then turned it to 'running' again. However their status will still be 'inactive' after some time. I had gone mad about this and spent a whole day trying to find out what went wrong.
In the end i know i went into the wrong direction. It is normal that after some time the status of the channels go to 'inactive'. As long as the transmission trigger is on then there will be no problem. When the next message comes in then the sender and receiver channels will be activated again.
So what actually went wrong. Argh it is because the portal team did not set the correct queue name to the JMS header of the XML message and thus no response from the whole flow!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)